Seven Kinds of Ghosts (Revised)

By Brother Ignatius Mary, OMSM (1955 – 2019)

Founder of the St. Padre Pio Center for Deliverance Counseling

I. Seeking out Ghosts

What does the Bible say about ghosts? We begin this discussion with an examination of some of the Scripture verses that give us clues on this subject. Scripture does not have much to say about this, and certainly, God has made it clear that this is an area we are not to seek out:

·       Lev. 19:31 tells us to not turn to mediums or to seek out spiritists. 

·       Lev. 20:6, 27 equates the seeking out of mediums with prostitution—doing so is an act of infidelity to God that is not just adultery, but involves a prurient interest in the occult things equating it with prostitution; a medium also is “hired,” which is an image of prostitution.

·       Deut. 18:10-11 gives a whole list of prohibitions involving the occult and spirit world.

Whatever Ghosts are or are not, it is clear that we are not to seek them out in any way.

II. What do We Know About Ghosts?

A. Composition of Ghosts

What are ghosts composed of? Well, we have a little hint of that in Luke 24:39 where the Apostles mistake the Resurrected Jesus for a ghost. Jesus says, “A ghost does not have flesh and bones.” Thus, we can know that whatever ghosts are, they are spiritual beings without flesh and bones.

B. Ghostly Visitations during Sleep

Is there an example of a ghostly visitation during sleep? In Job 4:15 it reads, “A spirit glided by my face and the hair on my body stood on end.”

This “spirit” was most probably an angel, but it does give us a clue of the human experience of meeting a spiritual entity and that such entities can and do come to us in that vulnerable time of twilight and dreams. 

This account is very close to the common experience many have of which can be described in technical jargon as a cataleptic somnambulism with a sensed or visual phantasmic perception.

Also in 2 Maccabees 15:12-16 is a passage about a dream (vision) of the Jewish leader Maccabeus. In this dream the ghosts of the high priest Onias and the great prophet Jeremiah appeared to him and encouraged him concerning the battle to come. Maccabeus told this dream to his men, encouraging them greatly. And afterward, they together defeated blasphemous Nicanor and his forces who thought to destroy the Jewish people.

C. Human Spirits in Ghostly Form?

Can a human being's spirit be transported? We know from accounts of Padre Pio that bi-location is possible, but those are yet unverified—so what about in Scripture? Well, there are a couple of verses that indicate this can happen. One is in Rev. 21:10 (17:3) where John was “carried away in the spirit.” But the most direct notion of this is in 2 Corinthians 12:2. It reads: “I know a man in Christ who fourteen years ago was caught up to the third heaven. Whether it was in the body or out of the body I do not know — God knows.” From this we know it is possible for man's spirit to be apart from even his living body at God's discretion. In the occult world this is called Astral Projection.

Can a person's body be transported spiritually? In Acts 8:39, after Philip was miraculously running up along the chariot of the Ethiopian, and after Philip baptized him, Philip then disappeared. “When they came up out of the water, the Spirit of the Lord suddenly took Philip away, and the eunuch did not see him again...” This episode appears to be a bodily transport in the spirit, but I suppose it could also be a corporeal bi-location too. It’s hard to be sure.

D. Other Examples of Ghostly Visitations

Here are several more examples of ghosts appearing in Scripture.

·       1 Samuel 28 tells of the Witch of Endor. In this story, Saul goes to a medium asking her to contact the dead prophet, Samuel. She apparently succeeds and Saul talks with Samuel and Samuel prophecies. The Scripture specifically states that “Samuel said.” There is no indication at all that this was a demonic impostor.

·       Sirach 46:20 shows Samuel prophesying from the grave.

·       Matthew 17:2 depicts the Transfiguration, where Moses and Elijah appear with Jesus in front of Peter, James, and John.

·       Luke 16:19-31 tells of the parable of the Rich Man and Lazarus. In verse 25, Abraham says that there is a great chasm between him and the Rich Man that cannot be crossed. This is not talking about a chasm between the earth and hell; it is a chasm between Abraham's bosom (which, in principle can be likened to heaven), and that of hell. Those in hell cannot come to the place of the saved, and the saved cannot reach down with compassion to those who are lost. It is in the next request from the Rich Man that we have a possible clue. The Rich Man wants Lazarus to go to his brothers to warn them of hell. Abraham says that there is no point in doing so: “If they do not listen to Moses and the Prophets, they will not be convinced even if someone rises from the dead” (verse 31). This passage implies the possibility of at least Lazarus being able to go to the living (it also implies that the Rich Man in hell cannot), but Abraham refuses the request not because it is impossible to do so, but because there is no point in doing so.

III. Conclusions from the Evidence

A. Scriptural Characteristics

Here’s what we know about ghosts based on the Bible.

·       We know that ghosts do not have flesh and bones (Luke 24:39).

·       We know that the dead can communicate with the living (1 Sam 28; Sirach 46:20).

·       We know that at least in some context allowed by God, the dead can be conjured in some fashion (1 Sam 28).

·       We know that it is possible for the dead to appear on the earth (Matt 72; 1 Sam 28).

·       We know that is may be possible for the dead to not only appear on the earth, but appear to people and talk with them (Luke 16:27-31; 1 Sam 28).

·       We know that it is possible for the living to bi-locate (Rev. 17:3; 21:10; 2 Cor 12:2).

·       We know that it is possible for spirits to communicate in dreams and the person to have a bodily reaction to the visitation (Job 4:15).

B. Comments from Peter Kreeft

Now, let's take a look at what Peter Kreeft says about this, a well-known professor of philosophy at Boston College and The King’s College. He wrote at least two books that mention this subject, Angels (and Demons): What Do we Know About Them? and Everything You Ever Wanted to Know About Heaven. His comments stem from his study of Thomas Aquinas, Philosophy, and other Catholic saints and observers on this subject.

Kreeft makes mention that many very reputable people, such as C.S. Lewis, have reported seeing a “ghost” of their wives. He points out that there are many instances from reputable sources of ghostly experiences that do not have any flavor of the demonic.

Based upon these anecdotal accounts, Kreeft and others talk about identifying three kinds of ghosts. I would add a fourth and a fifth category (from Kreeft’s material that he talks about, but doesn't categorize) and a sixth and seventh type from my own thoughts and observations.

C. Seven Kinds of Ghosts

The seven kinds of ghosts are each described below.

1. The Wispy Ones: The first kind Kreeft calls the “sad ones” or “wispy ones”. These Ghosts seem to be working out some unfinished business of some sort, or suffering some purgatorial purification. He says that these Ghosts would seem to be the ones who just barely made it into Purgatory, who feel little or no joy yet and who need to learn many painful lessons about their past lives on earth. God, in his compassion, may realize that to allow the person to get through Purgatory, it may be useful for them to learn some lessons on this earth.

2. The Anchored: A second kind may be some of these purgatorial ghosts who might have been so material minded in their earthly life that they can't detach themselves from these same material places or possessions. God may allow them to remain attached as they initially work out their need to “let go” of these spiritual anchors.

3. The Ignorant Dead: A third type might be those who don't yet realize they are dead. Again, in God's compassion, I can see why He would allow a spirit to linger for a short while so that they may realize their fate before leaving this world completely. Of course, in both the “second kind” and “third kind,” God could force the person to let go of the material place or to come on through the “gate” into the next life and prevent them from lingering. But a compassionate Father can also allow for a “little” tolerance to help the person to adjust.

4. Demons: A fourth type of ghost are the malicious and deceptive spirits. These are the ones who probably appear at séances and the like. They are most likely demons from hell disguised as dead loved ones, and not the human persons themselves.

5. Comforting Souls: A fifth type are the bright, happy spirits of dead friends and family who appear unbidden at God's will—not ours—with messages of hope and love. They seem to come from heaven. This type of ghost may come to a loved one to say goodbye or to comfort them after a funeral, for example. Or they may come to a relative or friend in great need. God may allow these dead relatives to come to the bedside of a loved one just before death. This would be an act of compassion to comfort the person as they pass from this life to the next. There are very trustworthy empirical and psychological evidence for these phenomena.

6. The Ghost Hunter Trap: A sixth type involves the ghost performing a certain scene repetitively. For example, a ghost of this type may go from the top of the stairs to the bottom and then disappear. This may happen over and over again. It never changes. The ghost never interacts with anyone, and we cannot interact with it. It never changes facial expression nor does it ever acknowledge anything around it. There are many theories to explain this phenomenon, but no real explanations. A popular notion is the concept of a “Residual Ghost”, which I originally posited in 1999. Since that time, a more careful study of physics changed my position on this.

Recently, the notion of a Residual Ghost is well expressed by Jason Hawes of the Atlantic Paranormal Society. He said “a residual haunting is like having an impression made in time. The entity may seem to be lost in a time warp. The spirit really isn't even there, only the energy is.” The glossary on their website gives a more formal definition: it is a “psychic imprint of a scene which is repeatedly played out, where the witness of such phenomenon essentially is peering into the past. The ghostly participants of these time-displacements often seem unaware of their living observers.”

However, there are significant problems with this theory. The physics of matter and energy makes this theory nearly impossible. Cody Polston, Founder and President of the Southwest Ghost Hunter's Association, gives a very good and succinct scientific explanation of why the Residual Haunting is implausible in his article, “Residual Hauntings, a Flawed Hypothesis.”

Ockham's razor (“All other things being equal, the simplest solution is the best”) advises us to avoid complex explanations. The theory of Residual Ghosts creates all sorts of problems that must be resolved before it can be plausible. In fact, a more plausible and simpler explanation is that “residual ghosts” are actually demonic in origin.

We know from cases throughout the history of the Church that one of Satan's tactics is to instill an unhealthy curiosity into things concerning the paranormal. To experience a “residual ghost” usually creates an interest and curiosity on the part of the experiencer in the paranormal. Sometimes the experiencer will further explore contact with the spirit world or other dangerous explorations into the paranormal. God warns us of the danger to our soul by trying to contact the dead. Our Lord calls these activities an abomination (Deut. 18:9-12). Satan would love to inspire such curiosity and to lure a person into his sandbox. 

7. Apparitions of the Living: Some “apparent” ghostly apparitions or effects may be the bi-location of the living—in other words, the “astral projections” of still-living people, to use the term of New Agers. This can be postulated from scriptural evidence (Rev. 17:3; 21:10; and 2 Cor 12:2), and from verified reports of bi-location of people like Padre Pio.

D. Our Initial Demeanor Toward Ghosts

What should our demeanor be toward “any” ghostly event? In a one-liner, the answer to that question is skepticism, caution, and testing. Because Satan can so easily fool our senses, we should look upon all ghostly events with great skepticism as to the idea of whether they come from God.

First, we must recognize the very great possibility that we are imagining things. The human mind has an enormous capacity for imagination and we can psyche ourselves into seeing things that are not there or misinterpret optical illusions.

Second, we must always presume that we may be tricked by Satan and what we see as a “ghost” is really just a demon in disguise, or Satan taking advantage of our overactive imaginations or taking advantage of optical illusions.

Third, we must be aware that it is possible for the event to be ordained by God in very rare cases.

E. Telling the Difference

How can we tell the difference between a Godly Apparition and one not of God?

First, a Godly apparition will never contradict any public revelation. This means that we need to be well versed in public revelation.

Second, a Godly apparition will never lead you to disobey your elders, superiors, or the Church. This means that we need to be aware of Church teaching and the like so that we can avoid disobedience or being led astray by an evil spirit. 

Third, a Godly apparition will lead you to feel peace. If the encounter with the ghost causes fear or confusion or uneasiness, it is likely an evil spirit.

Finally, a Godly spirit will always and without hesitation affirm the Lordship of Jesus Christ. It is imperative that we need to test the spirit with the formula found in 1 John 4:1-3 to ensure this.

F. Some Common Questions and Answers

1) In reference to the Anchored (the Ghosts of the Second Kind), how can we even begin to think that God would let someone stay on Earth to work out their need to "let go"?

To a degree, purgatory may serve this function in some cases. Letting go can even be an obstacle to Heaven completely.

“Jesus looked at him [now sad] and said, ‘How hard it is for those who have wealth to enter the kingdom of God! For it is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than for a rich person to enter the kingdom of God.’ Those who heard this said, ‘Then who can be saved?’ And he said, ‘What is impossible for human beings is possible for God’” (Luke 18:24-27).

I don't think allowing adjustment time would be a scripturally unfounded statement.

2) Referring to the Ignorant Dead (the Third Kind of Ghost), how can we even begin to think that God would allow someone to not realize they're dead, or that God would allow for a “little tolerance” to help the newly-dead person “adjust” to his new state?

When Job asks the Lord about things “too wonderful for [him] to know,” God answers him sharply: “Who is this that obscures divine plans with words of ignorance? Have the gates of death been shown to you, or have you seen the gates of darkness? Which is the way to the dwelling place of light, and where is the abode of darkness, that you may take them to their boundaries and set them on their homeward paths?” (Job 38:2,17,19).

Think the answer to that question is too harsh? Or that such an allowance made by God to a newly-dead soul is too impossible?

“... For stern as death is love, relentless as the nether world is devotion, its flames are a blazing fire” (Cf. Song of Songs 8:6).

“... for nothing will be impossible for God.” Luke 1:37

I do believe such a conjecture IS possible for God—the question is whether it is likely? A key to that would be whether it would be loving, for God is love (1 John 4:7).

Let us look into Church traditions of the past for precedents.

“‘A very probable opinion,’ says St. Thomas [Aquinas], ‘and one which, moreover, corresponds with the words of the saints in particular revelation is, that Purgatory has a double place for expiation. The first will be destined for the generality of souls, and is situated below, near to Hell; the second will be for particular cases, and it is from thence that so many apparitions occur.’ The holy Doctor admits, then, like so many others who share his opinions, that sometimes Divine Justice assigns a special place for purification to certain souls, and even permits them to appear either to instruct the living or to procure for the departed the suffrages of which they stand in need; sometimes also for other motives worthy of wisdom and mercy of God. Such is the general view concerning the location of Purgatory. Since we are not writing a controversial treatise, we add neither proofs nor refutations; these can be seen in authors such as Suarez and Bellarmin” (Fr. F.X. Shouppe, S.J., "Purgatory Explained by the Lives and Legends of the Saints," 1893).

3) But Scripture says that if you are not alive on earth, then you are in the presence of God.

Most definitely; but what does that mean?

Case in point: we know that souls in hell are in the "presence" of God because God is everywhere. Those in hell, however, do not “perceive” God's presence because they have chosen to blind themselves to the light of God. The nature of hell is to exist without perception of God's presence (thus without Love and all good things) ... to be “free” from God, yet those in hell are still in the presence of an omnipresent God.

Similarly, souls in Purgatory only have a partial awareness of God's presence. The veil of mortality has not yet passed away, yet they are still in God's presence.

“The first point about eternal life is that man is united with God. For God himself is the reward and end of all our labors: I am your protector and your supreme reward. This union consists in seeing perfectly. At present we are looking at a glass, darkly; but then we shall see face to face” (St. Thomas Aquinas, "Credo in Deum").

The point is that even when we are in the presence of God, it does not mean that our perception of Him is clear. We also know that it is possible to be in the presence of God while on the earth. The angels can be standing right next to us yet they are also in the constant presence of God—the beatific vision. With God all is possible according to His will.

4) The Bible doesn't delineate how, why, or if God places spirits on the earth other than visits by Gabriel, the Archangel Michael, Elijah, and Moses. 

Let me use another example from tradition that responds to “if God places spirits on the earth anywhere.” I qualify this example to say that it does not necessarily prove anything regarding “hauntings,” but is one of many documented examples of ghostly apparitions.

“We read the following in the Life of Father Nicholas Zucchi, written by Fr. Daniel Bartoli, of the Company of Jesus ...

“... a fortnight afterwards, this young man died, carried away by a rapid death, that left him little time to put the affairs of his conscience in order, so that there was everything to fear for his salvation.

“One evening, whilst the three novices were engaged together in holy conversation, the youngest was called away to the parlour. There she found a man wrapped in a heavy cloak, and with measured steps pacing the room.”

‘Sir,’ she said, ‘who are you? and why did you send for me?’ The stranger, without answering, drew near and threw aside the mysterious mantle which covered him. The religious then recognized the unfortunate deceased, and saw with horror that he was entirely surrounded by chains of fire that clasped his neck, wrists, knees, and ankles. ‘Pray for me!’ he cried, and disappeared” (Fr. F.X. Shouppe, S.J., "Purgatory Explained by the Lives and Legends of the Saints," 1893).

On an anecdotal side note, Padre Pio's first visit from a deceased human's soul was that of a monk who had died 300 years before in the cell Padre used at the time. The monk had been guilty of some infraction of his monkly duties, and so God sentenced him to remain in his cell until a monk would offer up some prayers and sacrifices on his behalf. I forget what laxity the monk had been guilty of, but I found it interesting that his “sentence” very much fit the “crime.”